06 September, 2008

man city?

A'kum n ello..

ney,do u know about the arabians that bought man city from that former thai PM?..
if i'm not mistaking,the arabs are family members that have their own company that have wealth for about 560bil pound...

560 BILLION POUND~~~

chelsea's owner,roman abramovich is wealth about 12bilion and people thought he is some kind of the the richest man in the world..

my,pak arab can make a rich russian man looks like a kid that collect coins...

and what make us then???

i hate to say it,but football nowadays really lose their passion.

lucky,i LOVE LIVERPOOL for their passion.the FANS want to OWN the CLUB.and that's brilliant cos passion around the team.eventhough the plan haven't settle yet,but that just show that football is beautiful with passion,and not dirty with money.

anyway,man city already spent around 100million already.and that's like 'wow' but with a feeling of 'are they stupid?'.but what can you expect from a rich man that thinks 100million is like RM100 for 1 keropok lekor.da~.

and now man city is thinking to buy ronaldo,fabregas,kaka and even the hot torres.all of them are the players that play football with passion,and now this rich men want to test their loyalty.

change the manager first if you want to be a good club then.as much as i hate chelsea,the stars that play for chelsea are mostly want to play for the club cos of mourinho and scolari.both of them are great.and fernando torres accept the 90,000/week for his wage instead of 100,000/week like when he was at atletico bcos he just wants to play football,and that's prove that he isn't some kind of bosman.and he also choose Liverpool cos rafa benitez is there.

these managers are managers with winning mentality.

jose mourinho being a jackass just for his team to win.
rafa benitez will directly tell the Liverpoool owners that he'll do his own way,and told them to just mind their own american bussiness.

nice~

i'm mad here after i read about man city wanted to buy torres.
  • currently listening to Funky Monkey Baby's 

No comments: